We use cookies to ensure you have the best browsing experience on our website. I do not think that there is a right way, as the right way usually depends on your use case.
Contribute to antkorwin/better-strings development by creating an account on GitHub.
Is there even a best way? Template-Strings sind String-Symbole, die über mehrere Zeilen gehende Zeichenketten sowie eingebettete Javascript-Ausdrücke ermöglichen.. Syntax `string text` `string text line 1 string text line 2` `string text ${expression} string text` tag `string text ${expression} string text` Some methods are very good for bulk operations, while others are very good at concatenating individual variables. We can use apostrophes and quotes easily that they can make our strings and therefore our code easier to read as well. Although this looks a lot like For these reasons, variable substitution using the SLF4J is much more acceptable than There are a million ways to concatenate strings. In JavaScript, the template literals (strings wrapped in backticks ` `) and ${expression} as placeholders perform the string interpolation. With string interpolation, there is no need to open and close strings a bunch of times in order to combine them into a single variable. When you use double quotes in Groovy you indicate to the runtime your intention to create a mutable String or Groovy String (GString for short). If you want your string to span multiple lines, you have to concatenate multiple strings: String myString = "This is my string" +" which I want to be "+ "on multiple lines. A template string could thus be written as − The As you can see in the graphs below, clearly the bulk operations outperformed those that required a loop.
However, I do think that there are a couple of wrong ways:If you would like to play around with this stuff yourself, I have placed the project Also, for logging statements, you typically have only two to three variables, making lining up the variables to the formatting string pretty trivial. In this example, the variable arguments have hard-set indices, but there isn’t a requirement for the indices to appear in that order in the formatting String. This is very cumbersome.Combining a collection/array of objects is radically different from concatenating individual variables in terms of readability. Java could soon offer language-level support for raw string literals. Adding delimiters when joining strings is also trivial; you just add the delimiter as an argument to To analyze performance, I microbenchmarked examples similar to those provided in the Readability section above. acknowledge that you have read and understood our so interpolation (in KOTLIN) goes this way: By using our site, you
"; It gets worse though. Template strings use back-ticks (``) rather than the single or double-quotes. As this is still one of the first search results on js string interpolation, it would be great if you could update it to reflect the general availability now. For example, JavaScript’s string interpolation is very easy to understand where variables are being injected inline:Unfortunately, Java doesn’t offer this method of string concatenation.
Links to the source code can found in the References section below.As you can see in the graphs below, clearly the bulk operations (which require creating an array or collection, either explicitly or under the hood) did worse than the individual ones.
Logging is quite a bit different from other use cases because the goal of logging is providing data in a very useful and easily readable format for developers. The expression like variables, function call, arithmetic can be placed inside the placeholder. Template literals are string literals that allow embedded expressions. In order to make it readable, the developer has to maintain all the whitespaces. Your typical logging statement usually isn’t nicely formatted for general consumption.
As a result, I’ve tried to talk in broad strokes and capture opinions that differ from mine.String interpolation is largely considered the most readable method for constructing strings from individual variables. However, if they don’t appear in the same order, it makes it more difficult to read and probably should be updated whenever the statement is modified.Streams are very awkward in this case because you have to explicitly create a list, convert it into a String, and then join it. Now we can write above myInfo function with string interpolation.We can see that the code is small and easily readable as compared to concatenation. String interpolation is a great programming language feature that allows injecting variables, function calls, arithmetic expressions directly into a string. With string interpolation, there is no need to open and close strings a bunch of times in order to combine them into a single variable. There are four main criteria for evaluating the best way to build a There are two common scenarios that we will be investigating when constructing a string:For this exercise, I’m going to focus on the following strategies for concatenating strings:I fully understand that readability is subjective. For example:The string interpolation is a great feature. String interpolation is largely considered the most readable method for constructing strings from individual variables. For example, JavaScript’s string interpolation is very easy to understand where variables are being injected inline: Unfortunately, Java … Check out JEP 326 to see how it could bring raw strings to Java. Instead, in SLF4J, it usually looks something like this:It is very easy to line up the variables and their substitution locations because you have the labels explicitly stated in the formatting string.